The November/December 2000 issue of Todays Chiropractic reports that
patients with persistent asthma that ranged from mildly persistent to
severely persistent not only improved dramatically under chiropractic
care but maintained that improvement for a two year follow-up period.
In the study, 47 patients from age 7 to 42 participated. The patients were
seen between 14 and 44 times and most began care at 3 visits per week
for the first 4 to 8 weeks.
Improvement was based on the patient's improvement in their symptoms as
well as their use of asthma medication. All 47 of the patients showed
significant improvements from 87 to 100 percent. At the two-year
follow-up, all 47 of the patients also reported that they maintained the
improvements they made at the beginning of the study.
The authors in this study point out that 17 million Americans suffer from
asthma and 14 people die in the United States every day as a result.
Annually, we spend more than $13 billion treating asthma medically, more
than three times the total amount spent every year on chiropractic care.
Yet, asthma is the leading cause of hospitalizations of children and has
shown an alarming 58% increase in its death rate since 1979, one of only
three diseases to do so.
By way of commentary, it seems obvious that throwing money and
medicine at asthma patients clearly isn't working. In fact, a good argument
could be made that it is making the situation worse. Might that $13 billion
be better spent, with better results, if it was spent on restoring asthma
patient's health and function with chiropractic care? We think so.
The patients in this study achieved improvements in their asthma
symptoms not because chiropractic is a cure for asthma. They improved
because chiropractic care helps restore normal body function by
removing interference to the body's master control system, the central
nervous system.
$13 billion worth of medical care every year and the problem has only
gotten worse. Every one of the patients in this study improved a minimum
of 87% under chiropractic care. The choice seems very clear.
In Touch
Vol. 5, No. 1 January 2001 ISSN 1525-416X
© 2001 In Touch P.O. Box 2353 Peachtree City, GA 30269