According to a report in the September 25, 2000 USA Today, more than half of the
experts hired by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to advise the agency on
which medicines should be approved had direct financial interests in the drug
they were asked to evaluate.
54% of the experts consulted had financial conflicts of interest in the drugs they
were evaluating, a violation of federal law. However, since 1998, the FDA had
waived the restrictions more than 800 times.
The conflicts involved included being employed by a drug company working on the
development of a drug and then serving on an FDA committee to evaluate it,
holding stock in the company involved, or receiving consulting fees or research
grants from companies involved.
While the FDA does reveal when a conflict of interest exists, it keeps the details
of the disclosure secret. As a result there is no way to determine which drug
company is involved or the financial interest at stake.
With few exceptions, the FDA follows the advice of the committees that review
drugs for approval.
By way of commentary, this article points out one of the reasons that taking drugs
has become so dangerous. Patient safety concerns come into question when the
people responsible for saying the drug is safe are the same ones who stand to gain
financially from its approval. As previously reported in this publication, studies
report that serious Adverse Drug Reactions result in approximately 106,000 deaths
every year. This figure accounted for nearly 5% of all causes of recorded death in
1994 making Adverse Drug Reactions the fourth leading cause of death in the
United States. These conflicts of interest are intolerable at best and deadly at
worst.
In Touch
Vol. 4, No. 11 November 2000 ISSN 1525-416X
© 2000